The Wonk Room

What Not To Name Your Geoengineering Project: Ice-Nine-One-One

Vonnegut: Cat's CradleThanks to the “academic malpractice” of SuperFreakonomics on the one hand and rising scientific concern that radical measures will have to be taken within decades to preserve human civilization on the other, talk about geoengineering to combat global warming is on the rise. One such project is Ice911, an unfortunately named scheme:

Ice911 is an engineering approach to reduce the melting of the ice. It is a solution that can be rapidly implemented. It has the potential to slow down the melt, provide interim mammal habitat, and perhaps even rebuild the ice.

The Ice911 is in fact a project to develop a low-tech method to increase the Arctic Ocean’s albedo in order to stop the feedback loop that is causing Arctic ice to melt at catastrophic rates, using millions of small, white floats. Although filling the world’s oceans with yet more plastic trash isn’t the most desirable rapid-cooling strategy, it sure beats options like those promoted in SuperFreakonomics, which have possible side effects like destroying the ozone layer. Ice911 has an impressive advisory board, and is led by Dr. Leslie Field, a world-class technologist.

However, the name Ice911 recalls “ice-nine,” a substance from Kurt Vonnegut’s classic science-fiction novel, Cat’s Cradle, one of the great parables of the “unintended consequences” of finding the “cheap and simple fix” to complex, global problems. As summarized at Technovelgy, “A general had a problem: mud. Marines have slogged their way through it for generations. Is it possible to get rid of mud? Without having to carry anything heavy? Marines already have enough to carry. Dr. Felix Hoenikker, an original thinker, found the ‘outside-the-box’ answer: a single crystal of Ice-Nine would crystallize every bit of water it touched”:

“…suppose, young man, that one Marine had with him a tiny capsule containing a seed of ice-nine, a new way for the atoms of water to stack and lock, to freeze. If that Marine threw that seed into the nearest puddle…?”
“The puddle would freeze?” I guessed.
“And all the muck around the puddle?”
“It would freeze?”
“And all the puddles in the frozen muck?”
“They would freeze?”
“And the pools and the streams in the frozen muck?”
“They would freeze?”
“You bet they would!” he cried. “And the United States Marines would rise from the swamp and march on!”

The book ends with the world’s water turned to ice-nine, the book’s fictional author one of the last remaining survivors of the human race, writing down his story as he prepares for his death. The fictional Felix Hoenikker, a “father of the Atomic Bomb,” recalls Dr. Edward Teller , the Manhattan Project physicist who later championed the Star Wars satellite laser system and in 1998 promoted a “Sunscreen for Planet Earth” — “solving” global warming through the injection of particles into the stratosphere, reviving an idea first proposed in 1979 as a thought experiment by fellow nuclear physicist (and now aging climate skeptic) Freeman Dyson. Teller’s protegé, Lowell Feld, has continued to champion Teller’s ideas and worldview at Nathan Myhrovld’s Intellectual Ventures, now promoted on bookshelves everywhere in SuperFreakonomics.






4 Responses to “What Not To Name Your Geoengineering Project: Ice-Nine-One-One”

  1. jps Says:

    I was astonished that this UK geoengineering study made no mention of converting to renewables and plug-in hybrids. Is “geoengineering” the word for “nontraditional mitigation”?


  2. Robert Waldmann Says:

    On Sulfate in the Stratosphere and Ozone, this seems to be an important reference. It is not super recent, but it is certainly not slanted pro-sulfate.

    http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=111467

    Note the claim is that injecting SO2 (which becomes sulfate) will delay the closing of the Antartic Ozone hole and cause a similar Arctic hole. Uhm how much damage to living things has been caused by the Antarctic Ozone hole ? How about Global warming ? How about plastic in the Ocean ?

    I’d say roughly none, some and some.

    I see you don’t agree with Levitt and Dubner. I can’t help suspecting that you associate SO2 geoengineering with opposition to efforts to reduce CO2 emissions.

    That doesn’t make US in the Arctic and Andarctic a central issue.

    In fact, there is a much more serious problem which SO2 geoengineering could cause — reduced rain in India and China.
    That is a first order vital important issue. Delaying the closing of the Antarctic Ozone hole isn’t — penguins are well covered up already. The importance of Arctic Ozone is somewhere in between.


  3. Brad Says:

    Robert — the primary proximate threat to living things isn’t the antarctic ozone hole itself, but the general destruction of the ozone layer, which has killed millions of people due to increased rates of skin cancer.

    Global warming has already caused extinctions, destabilized nations, killed coral reefs and forests around the world, and worsened the impact of hurricanes like Katrina. So, pretty profound damage to living things.

    At least that’s what scientists say.


  4. body armor Says:

    I really hope that President Obama focuses more on convincing Congress to provide necessary resources to buy the bullet proof vests our boys fighting overseas need to bring freedom to the region



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage