This morning, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and health care provocateur Betsy McCaughey took their health care debate to Dylan Ratigan’s ‘Morning Meeting.’ In a heated exchange that lasted almost 15 minutes, the two sparred over Medicare cuts, the public option, and health care spending. Weiner insisted that a robust public plan could restore competition to concentrated health care markets and reduce health care costs by an estimated $150 billion. McCaughey, the architect of the false “death panels” myth, continued her scare-mongering campaign against seniors: “The elephant in the room here is that all these bills are devastating care for seniors and the Baucus bill is the deadliest of all!”
Throughout the interview, McCaughey verbally attacked Ratigan and Weiner, complaining that she was being shut out of the debate. “Anthony, you are ignorant about health insurance,” she said, before insisting that “this will go down in history as one of the most browbeating interviews in television history.” “I hope that it does,” Ratigan replied. “And maybe you’ll learn at that point then to answer questions as opposed to go on television and cast accusations.” Watch a compilation:
After repeatedly refusing to explain how she would reduce health care spending, McCaughey proposed “inching up the eligibility age [for Medicare] one month a year until 2043 when the eligibility age reaches 70.” That could “put Medicare on a firm footing without cutting care for Medicare recipients.”
“That was a solid answer to your question,” Weiner exclaimed facetiously. “Take away 100% of Medicare for people 65 to 70.” According to the Congressional Budget Office, which McCaughey credited with the idea, eliminating “younger beneficiaries” from the Medicare program would do little to control costs. “Outlays for Medicare would [still] rise to 7.7 percent of GDP by 2050,” the CBO concluded.
Weiner pounced on McCaughey’s solution, which could cut as many as 11.3 million seniors from Medicare. “You want to gut Medicare,” Weiner told McCaughey. “That is exactly right. Now, I’m the one you’re accused of scaring seniors? You just said on this show you wanted to cut Medicare for everyone 65 to 70, isn’t that right?” “I will get it at 70 under the CBO proposal…and you will too.”


I watched the interview on The daily show and he couldn’t deal with this crazy lunatic.. because she keeps calling people sexist.. she uses her being a female against journalist as a weapon. She gets her lies out in tv and when u don’t let her she recourse to name calling.
Thank god this guy put her in her place.. we need journalist with more balls like this guy.. I’m sick of MSNBC and CNN letting them use their shows as propaganda outlets… if they want to lie and spill their ignorance.. they need to go to FOX and stay in FOX
October 6th, 2009 at 1:01 pmShe is, in fact, nuts. Hope she has mental health coverage, unlike many americans.
That said, Weiner’s math WAS wrong–her preferred solution would raise the Medicare eligibility age to 70, but only for those who are currently five years old, as it would take 60 years (as I understand it) at one month/year to get the eligibility up five years.
Now, something that takes that long clearly won’t fix the problem, as noted in the story and even by the CBO, but let’s not further mislead the American people–McCaughey has done enough of that already
October 7th, 2009 at 9:48 am