The coal industry front group embroiled in an Astroturf scandal is now arguing that mountaintop removal coal mining helps communities “hampered because of a lack of flat space.” Joe Lucas, vice president of communications for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE), told the Guardian that dynamiting the tops off of mountains — far from being the “rape of Appalachia” — is actually a boon to rural communities:
I can take you to places in eastern Kentucky where community services were hampered because of a lack of flat space — to build factories, to build hospitals, even to build schools. In many places, mountain-top mining, if done responsibly, allows for land to be developed for community space.
The concept of “responsible” mountain-top mining is laughable, as Mountain Justice explains:
Traditional mining communities disappear as jobs diminish and residents are driven away by dust, blasting and increased flooding and dangers from overloaded coal trucks careening down small, windy mountain roads. Mining companies buy many of the homes and tear them down. Dynamite is cheaper than people, so mountaintop removal mining does not create many new jobs.
Mountaintop removal generates huge amounts of waste. While the solid waste becomes valley fills, liquid waste is stored in massive, dangerous coal slurry impoundments, often built in the headwaters of a watershed. The slurry is a witch’s brew of water used to wash the coal for market, carcinogenic chemicals used in the washing process and coal fines (small particles) laden with all the compounds found in coal, including toxic heavy metals such as arsenic and mercury. Frequent blackwater spills from these impoundments choke the life out of streams.
ACCCE’s Joe Lucas — who can’t even admit that coal pollution contributes to global warming — is giving new meaning to the idea of the Flat Earth Society.


Yes, it sure is inconvenient to build in a mountainous region, but he sort of fails to mention that no one could actually build on these flattened mountain tops as the Coal Industry would be mining. But he doesn’t really care about the people or their living conditions or anything but profits for the Coal Industry, just ask Bonner and Associates.
Next argument: Fill in the Grand Canyon, as it really is to difficult to get from the North to South Rim, with all that up and down cliff stuff!
August 5th, 2009 at 2:04 pmNow, let’s not be too harsh on Mr. Lucas. He’s just responding to the torrents of survey responses from local Appalachian residents who say they want to live on the flatlands.
August 6th, 2009 at 1:06 pm/sarcasm
Good concise article, and funny comments. Ya gotta laugh sometimes at the ridiculous posturing by professional liars.
August 8th, 2009 at 10:32 am6.7 billion tons per year!
August 9th, 2009 at 9:02 pm