Comments on: O’Reilly ‘Would Be Stunned’ If The Senate Passes ‘Cap And Con’ http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/17/oreilly-cap-and-con/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: jps http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/17/oreilly-cap-and-con/comment-page-1/#comment-155570 jps Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:16:01 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/?p=19872#comment-155570 Hey Brad, are you on Twitter? <a href="http://twitter.com/jsalsman/status/2695125765" rel="nofollow">Please have a look at this.</a> I'm not sure how accurate that is, but if it's anywhere in the ballpark, the climate bill could easily erase the deficit with plenty of room left over for the subsidies we were talking about. Anyway, I hope you have been well. Oh! @DonBlankenship didn't try to call me an idiot when I suggested liquefaction for plastic stock, which is sequestration, and independence. I figure, so what if he gets even richer as long as the middle class grows. The guys at Climate Progress seem okay with electrodynamic assist (plug-in hybrid) rockets, too, as far as I can tell. Could you please check in to that? Hey Brad, are you on Twitter? Please have a look at this. I’m not sure how accurate that is, but if it’s anywhere in the ballpark, the climate bill could easily erase the deficit with plenty of room left over for the subsidies we were talking about. Anyway, I hope you have been well.

Oh! @DonBlankenship didn’t try to call me an idiot when I suggested liquefaction for plastic stock, which is sequestration, and independence. I figure, so what if he gets even richer as long as the middle class grows.

The guys at Climate Progress seem okay with electrodynamic assist (plug-in hybrid) rockets, too, as far as I can tell. Could you please check in to that?

]]>