http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/09/sotomayor-witnesses/ Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:01:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/09/sotomayor-witnesses/comment-page-1/#comment-155337 Michelle Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:10:46 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/?p=18413#comment-155337 Charmaine Yoest is not "anti-choice", but pro-life. There are other choices besides killing an unborn child, taking responsibility for one's actions, personal growth to be able to care for the child and adoption are three alternatives. Abortion is not just a cultural issue, it is a moral, ethical, and (in my opinion), a Constitutional issue, as we are supposedly guaranteed "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". Charmaine Yoest is not “anti-choice”, but pro-life. There are other choices besides killing an unborn child, taking responsibility for one’s actions, personal growth to be able to care for the child and adoption are three alternatives. Abortion is not just a cultural issue, it is a moral, ethical, and (in my opinion), a Constitutional issue, as we are supposedly guaranteed “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.

]]> http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/09/sotomayor-witnesses/comment-page-1/#comment-155309 Patrick Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:48:54 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/?p=18413#comment-155309 Rosenkranz testified in 2006 to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the "recent brouhaha over presidential signing statements is largely unwarranted." Rosenkranz testified in 2006 to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the “recent brouhaha over presidential signing statements is largely unwarranted.”

]]> http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/07/09/sotomayor-witnesses/comment-page-1/#comment-155234 Darlyn Dem Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:41:48 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/?p=18413#comment-155234 It appears that you rarely allow truth to interfere with the opinions you hold or for which you are paid to blog. The link for Linda Chavez referred to someone else entirely. Your assertion about David Rivkin is way off: he is a constitutional lawyer, and as such is "for" the balance of power and limitations on the power of all three branches of our government (or didn't you learn that in public school?) It appears that you rarely allow truth to interfere with the opinions you hold or for which you are paid to blog. The link for Linda Chavez referred to someone else entirely. Your assertion about David Rivkin is way off: he is a constitutional lawyer, and as such is “for” the balance of power and limitations on the power of all three branches of our government (or didn’t you learn that in public school?)

]]>