This past Sunday, University of Southern California professor Roberto Suro announced in a Washington Post editorial that Emma Lazarus’ “Give me your tired, your poor…” poem should be permanently removed from the Statue of Liberty:
I’d like to suggest a little surgery that will make the symbol more appropriate today: Let’s get rid of The Poem…Inscribed on a small brass plaque mounted inside the statue’s stone base, the poem is an appendix, added belatedly, and it can safely be removed, shrouded or at least marked with a big asterisk.
According to Suro, the Statue of Liberty was meant to be a symbol of freedom and liberty, not immigration. Suro also points out that most immigrants come to the U.S. for economic reasons that he deems totally unrelated to the political values that Lazarus’ poem conveys. Suro thinks most immigrants are “adventurous” and “ambitious,” not “tired and poor.”
Yet Suro doesn’t account for the fact that, for many immigrants, shear economic destitution is often what drives ambition and any sense of adventure. He also doesn’t consider the notion that economic mobility (or the lack thereof) is often tied hand-in-hand with economic justice and various degrees of political despotism. Maybe immigrants don’t come as “huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” but chances are they’d have an easier time feeding their families in their home countries if government corruption and dysfunction didn’t lock them into rigid class systems that even emerging democracies are still struggling to shake off.
Now, Suro’s notion that “we live in a different era of immigration” and that the “schmaltzy sonnet offers a dangerously distorted picture” is being used by others to argue against immigration altogether. A Fox News broadcast that aired this past holiday weekend used an interview with Suro as a launching pad for Mark Krikorian’s vehemently anti-immigrant views:
KRIKORIAN: The problem really isn’t that immigrants are coming here to rip us off. This isn’t like a welfare queen issue. The problem here is that immigrants are a mismatch for a modern society like ours.
Watch it:
Krikorian also followed-up his interview with an article, “Bad Poetry Makes for Bad Policy,” in which he referenced Suro’s remarks to convince his readers that the U.S. has “outgrown” immigration. Krikorian authored the book, entitled “The New Case Against Immigration, Both Legal and Illegal,” which features the Statue of Liberty on the cover with her hand blocking new waves of immigration. Most economic data suggests that Krikorian is wrong.


So Roberto Suro and Krikorian are native American Indians and it is ok for them to be here? Sheesh……. The ignorance bites.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:36 pmIn the sense that there are too many people like that schmuck who wants to close the door after his ancestors got in, he is right that we need to take the poem down. America is no longer a beacon of freedom. Thanks to the politicians since Reagan, including Clinton, we have been moving faster and faster towards a corporate controlled system (i.e., fascism) which excludes anyone who is different. That poem epitomized the US as it was generations ago. It no longer applies, so take it down before we are charged with false advertising.
July 7th, 2009 at 12:38 pmI find this amazing and ahistorical. Emma Lazarus’s sonnet “The New Colossus” is one of the most beautiful and inspiring lyrics in English language poetry. The Statue of Liberty has been a symbol of America’s gift of hope to the entire world. Why destroy that link to the past? If you believe the Statue needs a new link to your idea of the present and future, advocate adding it. But not at the expense of the past – which in this case is also the present and the future.
July 7th, 2009 at 3:31 pm