The Wonk Room

Global Warming Denier Stephen Moore: Climate Change Is ‘Climate Improvement’

In an otherwise illuminating segment on the Diane Rehm radio show Wednesday about climate change impacts in the United States, one guest played the fool: Stephen Moore — the Wall Street Journal editorial board member, Cato Institute senior fellow, National Review contributing editor, and regular CNBC and Fox News commentator. While his fellow guests — Obama science advisor John Holdren, American Progress president John Podesta, and Bush environmental advisor James Connaughton — discussed the impacts of global warming and how the country can act to prevent catastrophe, Moore argued that the White House’s new climate impacts report is “Stalinistic”:

What I object to about this report is some of the language in this is sort of almost Stalinistic, that there’s an unequivocal conclusion that it’s inarguable that this is happening, that there’s overwhelming agreement among the scientists. None of that is true.

Listen:


Moore also cited the repeatedly debunked Oregon Petition and Bjorn Lomborg’s Copenhagen Consensus, arguing it is “highly irresponsible” not to debate the science of man-made climate change. Even though Dianne Rehm admonished Moore for his anti-science outbursts, he continued to pollute the airwaves with Pollyannish complacency . . .

We’ve talked about global warming as climate improvement.

The good news is that the bad news is wrong.

. . . an endless stream of discredited lies about global warming and carbon pollution. . .

– John just said nine of the last ten years are the warmest on record. That just isn’t true. In fact, they’ve gone back, and it turns out NASA made a mistake in the model which didn’t get any publicity. John, actually, the truth is the 1930s was a warmer decade than the last decade.

– If there’s a slight uh, global warming trend — and we’re talking about relatively slight, heh — John, there’s just no question that the slight warming of the temperature actually improves agriculture, it doesn’t hurt agriculture. In fact agricultural output would go up.

– In fact, I’m old enough to remember when the scientific consensus that there was going to be cooling, remember, in the 1970s we’re going to have global cooling and we’re all going to starve to death and we’re not going to have agriculture. So you can’t, heh, have it both ways. You can’t say cooling is going to hurt agriculture and warming is going to hurt agriculture.

We’ve reduced carbon emissions more than Europe has.

. . . apocalyptic and false warnings about the cost of action . . .

I call it economic hari-kari for this country.

The economic consensus is this will affect middle class families in a very negative way.

– The one thing I want people to be very clear on: If we do something like the cap and trade, it’s going to cause a gut-wrenching decline in the number of jobs here and it’s going to cause a decline in people’s living standards. Maybe that’s something we need to do to deal with global warming. It’s going to mean the cost of filling up your car, gasoline costs is going to go up, the cost of heating and air conditioning your home is going to go up, the cost of um, the cost of uh, buying any good or service that’s produced here will go up, because energy is a part of it.

– I was in Wheeling, WV, going down the Ohio River. That’s the epicenter of the Rust Belt in America. Steel factories, chemical plants. A big coal-fired power plant. By the way, John, that’s Democratic country, those are Democratic votes. If we do cap and trade, that’s all wiped out.

. . . and ad hominem attacks:

– The reason I think John and a lot of Democrats don’t want to do [a carbon tax] is there’s a bit of dishonesty here, you hide what the tax really is.

To use this term “denier” is to put down the debate.

When speaking to like-minded audiences, however, Moore apes Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) and calls global warming a “scam.” Last month, Moore proudly waved his denier credentials before an audience of conservatives in New Jersey, telling them to “roaring applause”:

I happen to believe that global warming is the biggest scam of the last two decades.

You can listen to the entire program here.






6 Responses to “Global Warming Denier Stephen Moore: Climate Change Is ‘Climate Improvement’”

  1. afisher Says:

    The term “global warming” should be abandoned by all. The argument made by those with absolutely no knowledge, say “gee, it is colder than usual” so obviously there isn’t any global warming.

    These deniers refuse to acknowledge what is happening to the polar ice cap…so let’s use “Climate Change”!

    There was a legislator from MN who actually wanted it to get warmer in his state…because it was a bad / harsh winter…freezing temps, flooding, etc. Yeah, it was rhetoric, but frustrating to hear a supposed learned legislator talk as if he was an expert, not a pundit.

    The “say it enough and it becomes conventional wisdom” is a scary reality when you have these yo-yo’s talking non-stop and without a true discussion by a broad panel of experts.

    Someone really young needs to keep all these clips and pass them on to the generations who will suffer the effects of those deniers if their attempts stop any regulation succeed.


  2. jps Says:

    afisher: Who was the legislator who wanted warmer weather? We can help their election opponents with the flood insurance bills.


  3. Freedoms Truth Says:

    “the truth is the 1930s was a warmer decade than the last decade.”

    This is true for the USA.

    “What I object to about this report is some of the language in this is sort of almost Stalinistic, that there’s an unequivocal conclusion that it’s inarguable that this is happening, that there’s overwhelming agreement among the scientists. None of that is true”

    This is correct. You can see refutations of the egregious lies and distortions in the Obama admin report in Prof Pielke’s blog.
    http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/06/obamas-phil-cooney-and-new-ccsp-report.html

    The Obama admin reports completely distorted the science on hurricanes – there is NO link, yet they said there was. The science says otherwise.

    There is science vs Climate-Change-is-a-crisis hysteria. Obama admin has gone the way of peddling hysteria. Shame on them.


  4. Freedoms Truth Says:

    “but frustrating to hear a supposed learned legislator talk as if he was an expert, not a pundit.”

    Yeah, like Al Gore and his mock-umentary.


  5. Brad Says:

    afisher is referring to House Agriculture chair Collin Peterson (D-MN), who told reporters, “We’ve just had the biggest floods and coldest winters we’ve ever had. They’re saying to us [that climate change is] going to be a big problem because it’s going to be warmer than it usually is; my farmers are going to say that’s a good thing since they’ll be able to grow more corn.”


  6. Freedoms Truth Says:

    “my farmers are going to say that’s a good thing since they’ll be able to grow more corn.””

    This statement is valid for canada and the northern plains, altough in truth 2008 has been colder than it was 10 years prior – no warming.

    Whether its gets warmer or colder, the added CO2 will help in plant growth in any case. More CO2 is good for plants and good therefore for many farmers.



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage