The Wonk Room

Begala Memo Makes Case For Defining Progressive Health Proposals

begalaPaul Begala has released a point-by-point debunk of Frank Luntz’s now infamous health care memo, in which the GOP wordsmith instructed Republicans to attack the president’s health reform efforts by criticizing the deficiencies in foreign health care systems.

The top quote is key: “The only people who give any credence to Republican Senators’ rhetoric is Democratic Senators,” Begala quotes George Mitchell as saying. In other words, the public agrees with progressive health care priorities and in this health care debate, Americans start out on our side. Begala:

That fact is this: the overwhelming majority of American support health care reform. In fact, Dr. Luntz himself notes that voters trust Democrats over Republicans by a whopping 20 percent on health care . If health care reform were unpopular, Republicans would not resort to misleading rhetoric to mask their opposition. The striking thing about Luntz’s memo is how the rhetoric he advocates apes our message.

So the problem is not in convincing the American people that we need reform; they’ve heard that message before and they overwhelmingly agree with it. The real goal, this time, is to do a better job in mobilizing that public support into action for change. As Chris Jennings often argues, “when it comes to health reform, fear beats hope. In the past, this has meant that nothing gets done.”

Progressives need to answer conservative attacks by defending progressive proposals on their merits — as Begala does– rather than resorting to the comfortable/familiar rhetoric of “affordable health care for all” or “shared responsibility.” Such buzz language has doomed past reform efforts. As Haynes Johnson and David Broder argue in their analysis of President Clinton’s failed health care reform effort, by relying on hollow buzz words, rather than policy specifics, the Clintons allowed the opposition to ascribe meaning to reform rhetoric. Let’s hope we doesn’t make that same mistake again.






4 Responses to “Begala Memo Makes Case For Defining Progressive Health Proposals”

  1. stateofthedivision Says:

    Funny, I wrote a memo on health care reform this morning. It reveal what’s behind the Luntz/Begala buzz words:

    http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2009/05/health-care-deform-predictions.html


  2. stateofthedivision Says:

    Noted health economist Uwe Reinhardt also wrote a memo. He didn’t reveal his conflicts of interest in his NYT piece:

    http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/05/uwe-uwe-ehi-gotta-go.html


  3. cmhmd Says:

    Begala nails it pretty well in his paper, but I wish he would remind people about Medicare.

    This is our government run system that runs well. People on Medicare don’t wait for hip or knee relacements, reimbursement is reasonable and relatively hassle free, and the patients are happy with it.

    When I first read the Luntz memo, that was my original thought: every time he talks about government-run, bureaucrats, etc., my response would be, “You mean like Medicare?”. And the back up would be, “If this concept is so horrible, why do we use it in our VA system for our Veterans?”


  4. mickster Says:

    Lets clear something up quick. A poet or novelist is a wordsmith. Luntz is a propagandist pure and simple. Lets not demean poets and novelists by putting Luntz’ manipulation of language to create fear (amongst other emotions) as some kind or artful crafting of prose. Please.



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage