The Wonk Room

Whitehouse: Senate Is Corrupted By Carbon Pollution Cash

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), in a Senate hearing on the EPA budget this morning, decried the extraordinary amount of spending by corporate global warming polluters to lobby Congress. Reading from a report on new lobbying disclosures, Whitehouse noted that carbon polluters such as electric utilities and oil and gas companies have spent nearly $80 million on lobbying just in the first quarter of 2009. Whitehouse concludes:

So if we wonder why the Senate is the last place in America that still doesn’t get it – that climate change is a real problem for people and that carbon pollution is something that people should pay for when they emit it, big utilities, big industry — gee, connect the dots.

Watch it:

“For as long as there’s been pollution,” Sen. Whitehouse explained, “there has been a constant battle with polluters who don’t want to pay the costs of their pollution, either preventing or cleaning it up”:

They’d like to just dump it and have it be somebody else’s problem. There’s absolutely nothing new about that. Polluters don’t want to pay. What’s new is our understanding of what the costs are of carbon pollution. Economic costs, environmental costs, wildlife and habitat costs, and as we’ve recently learned, very significant national security costs.

The E&E News story Whitehouse entered in the Congressional Record explains how pollution lobbyists are vastly outspending environmental groups and clean energy companies:

Thus far in 2009, all environmental groups combined have spent a grand total of $4.7 million on lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The Nature Conservancy, which has spent $850,000 thus far, tops the list.

The various renewable energy companies have spent a grand total of $7.5 million, with the biggest spender there being the American Wind Energy Association which has spent just over $1.2 million.

By comparison, Exxon Mobil Corp. alone has spent more than $9.3 million in the first few months of 2009. The company’s lobbying totals exceed any other single corporation or organization except the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has spent a total of $15.5 million.

The chamber, which has been by far the single biggest lobbying force in Washington over the last decade, has likewise been active in the energy debate this year, though it is unclear from the disclosure records what amount — if any — the organization has spent on lobbying of lawmakers. Its totals are not included in the calculations for any energy-specific industries.

Other heavyweights in the energy sector include: Chevron Corp. at $6.8 million, ConocoPhillips at $6 million, BP at $3.6 million and Marathon Oil at $3.4 million. All four are among the 20 biggest lobbying spenders in any sector in the first few months of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

As for electric utilities, the biggest single lobbying spender is Southern Co. at $3.7 million, followed by the Edison Electric Institute at $2.6 million, American Electric Power Co. Inc. at $1.7 million and Exelon Corp. at $1.54 million.






4 Responses to “Whitehouse: Senate Is Corrupted By Carbon Pollution Cash”

  1. larrydalooza Says:

    Businesses that sell power will not pay a dime… consumers will pay. You get what you pay for. Besides the demonizing of CO2 being BS, believing that business is bad will surely kill us all.


  2. Vanessa Williamson Says:

    If businesses weren’t going to pay a dime if the legislation passes, why would they be spending so much money lobbying against it? These companies are lobbying for a reason — it’s a smart short-term investment for them to avoid reform. Of course, in the long run, maybe it would make sense for them to spend that money on innovation.


  3. A Siegel Says:

    Larry

    Who is paying for and going to pay for the impacts of climate change? The consumers (the citizens) …

    Oh, that’s right, you probably don’t believe in the scientific Theory of Global Warming and that it could impact our 6000 year old world.


  4. Craig Says:

    Larry,

    Vanessa is absolutely right. If major polluters are so certain that the costs can be passed on to consumers, then why the $80 million in lobbying. The congress could require 100 percent sale of the pollution allowances just as the Obama administration advocates. The revenue generated by this sale could then be used to shelter consumers from higher energy prices. That is inherently the most equitable path to follow. Polluters pay. Polluters innovate. But that isn’t going to happen. What is happening is yet another example of concentrated power in the private sector dangerously warping public policy. Only in the case of climate change, unlike labor or health policy, the stakes are much higher.



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage