<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WonkLine: April 13, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/comment-page-1/#comment-149337</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/#comment-149337</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, the U.S. government does $900 million in business with the same firm that sold the intelligence equipment to Iran.  How much domestic spying gear did that buy?

In the U.S., we shouldn&#039;t be afraid of monitoring if we don&#039;t have anything to hide.  In other words, our domestic spys are trustworthy.

For Iran, private citizens deserve privacy, i.e., their domestic spys are oppressive.  

The question remains, how is the U.S. tampering inside Iran?  We have a long, clear history of overthrowing governments for corporations.  Democratic Iran fell at the wishes of Anglo-Iranian Oil. 

Leaders offer meaningless platitudes, while pursuing clear policies that enrich their big money donors.  Watch to see what kind of punishment these two companies get for selling to Iran?  It will be little to none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, the U.S. government does $900 million in business with the same firm that sold the intelligence equipment to Iran.  How much domestic spying gear did that buy?</p>
<p>In the U.S., we shouldn&#8217;t be afraid of monitoring if we don&#8217;t have anything to hide.  In other words, our domestic spys are trustworthy.</p>
<p>For Iran, private citizens deserve privacy, i.e., their domestic spys are oppressive.  </p>
<p>The question remains, how is the U.S. tampering inside Iran?  We have a long, clear history of overthrowing governments for corporations.  Democratic Iran fell at the wishes of Anglo-Iranian Oil. </p>
<p>Leaders offer meaningless platitudes, while pursuing clear policies that enrich their big money donors.  Watch to see what kind of punishment these two companies get for selling to Iran?  It will be little to none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/comment-page-1/#comment-149326</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/wonk-041309/#comment-149326</guid>
		<description>Wow, the government&#039;s &lt;em&gt;national laboratories will also team with industry alliances and national accounts to assist in &lt;strong&gt;cost-shared &lt;/strong&gt;research, development, and deployment.&lt;/em&gt;

Mr. Obama assured corporate executives that he wants their companies to remain competitive, and that he is interested &quot;over time&quot; in &lt;strong&gt;lowering corporate rates &lt;/strong&gt;in exchange for closing corporate loopholes.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123897085163290813.html

Add it up:

&lt;em&gt;Lower R &amp; D costs
Lower corporate taxes
Shift health insurance costs to employee&lt;/em&gt;

That should drive up CEO incentive pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the government&#8217;s <em>national laboratories will also team with industry alliances and national accounts to assist in <strong>cost-shared </strong>research, development, and deployment.</em></p>
<p>Mr. Obama assured corporate executives that he wants their companies to remain competitive, and that he is interested &#8220;over time&#8221; in <strong>lowering corporate rates </strong>in exchange for closing corporate loopholes.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123897085163290813.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123897085163290813.html</a></p>
<p>Add it up:</p>
<p><em>Lower R &amp; D costs<br />
Lower corporate taxes<br />
Shift health insurance costs to employee</em></p>
<p>That should drive up CEO incentive pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
