Since both Sens. Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) announced their opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act, a lot of debate has been centered on whether or not the bill has any chance of passing in the current Congress.
Obviously, counting votes is an important exercise, but lost in the brouhaha has been the justification for labor law reform. Fortunately, Mother Jones’ Josh Harkinson gave us a refresher course, courtesy of Whole Foods:
Shortly before the inauguration of President Barack Obama, the manager of a Whole Foods grocery store in the San Francisco Bay Area gathered his employees in a conference room for a chat about labor organizing. [...] According to a tape of the meeting obtained by Mother Jones, the manager went on to imply that joining a union would lead to reprisals: “It’s interesting to note that once you become represented by the union,” he said, “basically everything, every benefit you have, is kind of thrown out the window, and you renegotiate a contract.”
Essentially, the manager is implying that a legal decision to unionize would result in the company removing the workers’ benefits during contract negotiations. This is the sort of fearmongering that the Employee Free Choice Act is meant to address. And it’s by no means an isolated incident, as plenty of employers stall, delay, and intimidate workers during and after organizing drives. Consider:
- It took meat cutters at a Texas Wal-Mart nine years after they voted to form a union to begin negotiations with the company.
- Employees at a Rite-Aid drug warehouse in California voted more than one year ago to form a union, but Rite-Aid is trying to run out the clock so that it can “stop the pretense of negotiating” and then “try to undo” the workers’ vote.
- In December, Starbucks was found to have “illegally fired three baristas and otherwise violated federal labor laws in seeking to beat back unionization efforts at several of its Manhattan cafes.”
- On March 31, 2007, workers at the Trump Casino in Atlantic City, NJ, voted to form a union. They still have no contract.
There is an undeniable need to repair a broken system for workers, both in forming a union and ensuring good faith negotiations with employers afterward. A few Senators backing down in the face of business pressure doesn’t change that.


The Association of Free Wonk Room Blog Commenters demands tax simplification, another round of demerits for the incrementalists, position papers on the payment of excess reserve interest, the use of depleted uranium, and the proper extrapolation of expected medical, energy, educational, and weather-related expenses showing their bang-for-buck ratio for the 10 year period.
April 8th, 2009 at 8:59 am…incrementalists, and* position papers
Also, a standard UTF-8 set of proofreading symbols until such time as preview is implemented. Thank you for your kind consideration of these demands.
April 8th, 2009 at 9:21 amMore evidence of the need for EFCA. Union yes!
April 8th, 2009 at 1:06 pm