<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANALYSIS: Conservative Budget Alternative Saves Average CEO $1.5 Million Every Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/comment-page-1/#comment-134276</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/#comment-134276</guid>
		<description>Well, yes. Democrats have succeeded in establishing a tax code that is so lopsided that the only way to more towards more equality is by cutting the taxes of the better off. After all, they&#039;re the ones that pay the taxes! So now we&#039;ve gotten in a ridiculous situation where any real tax cuts are going to produce much teeth gnashing about cutting taxes for the wealthy and not giving a break to the poor. That&#039;s because -- outside of payroll taxes -- their tax liability is incredibly small!

Congrats Democrats, this really is political genius on your part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes. Democrats have succeeded in establishing a tax code that is so lopsided that the only way to more towards more equality is by cutting the taxes of the better off. After all, they&#8217;re the ones that pay the taxes! So now we&#8217;ve gotten in a ridiculous situation where any real tax cuts are going to produce much teeth gnashing about cutting taxes for the wealthy and not giving a break to the poor. That&#8217;s because &#8212; outside of payroll taxes &#8212; their tax liability is incredibly small!</p>
<p>Congrats Democrats, this really is political genius on your part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/comment-page-1/#comment-134127</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/#comment-134127</guid>
		<description>&quot;A plan that doesn&#039;t injure anyone sounds like a good plan to me.&quot;

But it would hurt everyone -- in the form of massively-cut government revenue.  We have a deficit as is, and there&#039;s no politically-viable way even the most right-wing Republican can cut spending enough to balance the budget.  

Despite massive spending in Obama&#039;s budget as it stands, at least it projects some sort of deficit-cutting goal (however unrealistic it may be.)  The Republican&#039;s plans offers no numbers projections whatsoever, and until it does we can&#039;t compare the merits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A plan that doesn&#8217;t injure anyone sounds like a good plan to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>But it would hurt everyone &#8212; in the form of massively-cut government revenue.  We have a deficit as is, and there&#8217;s no politically-viable way even the most right-wing Republican can cut spending enough to balance the budget.  </p>
<p>Despite massive spending in Obama&#8217;s budget as it stands, at least it projects some sort of deficit-cutting goal (however unrealistic it may be.)  The Republican&#8217;s plans offers no numbers projections whatsoever, and until it does we can&#8217;t compare the merits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/comment-page-1/#comment-134126</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/#comment-134126</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I believe people with an income over $250,000 should pay a 50% bringing them down to the level of the working people.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I believe people with an income over $250,000 should pay a 50% bringing them down to the level of the working people.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeThink</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/comment-page-1/#comment-133914</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeThink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/#comment-133914</guid>
		<description>Was there any analysis of how the other tax brackets would fare?  Or was the 10% minimum wage group the only group who did not benefit from this plan? (they also are the group that pays the least in taxes)  The article smells a bit like selective journalism, - it doesnt show any group getting harmed, it only shows that no one is getting hurt with this plan.  A plan that doesn&#039;t injure anyone sounds like a good plan to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there any analysis of how the other tax brackets would fare?  Or was the 10% minimum wage group the only group who did not benefit from this plan? (they also are the group that pays the least in taxes)  The article smells a bit like selective journalism, &#8211; it doesnt show any group getting harmed, it only shows that no one is getting hurt with this plan.  A plan that doesn&#8217;t injure anyone sounds like a good plan to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/comment-page-1/#comment-133821</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/03/24/analysis-conservative-budget-alternative-saves-average-ceo-15-million-every-year/#comment-133821</guid>
		<description>This is disaster capitalism at its best.  Global corporatists want to drive down taxes, worker pay/benefits and regulation to the lowest global common denominator.  

The implied threat is the big money boys will take their capital and run.

http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/03/big-money-boys-gather-at-wsjs-future-of.html

Watch to see if Congress lets them bolt with taxpayer supplied capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is disaster capitalism at its best.  Global corporatists want to drive down taxes, worker pay/benefits and regulation to the lowest global common denominator.  </p>
<p>The implied threat is the big money boys will take their capital and run.</p>
<p><a href="http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/03/big-money-boys-gather-at-wsjs-future-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/03/big-money-boys-gather-at-wsjs-future-of.html</a></p>
<p>Watch to see if Congress lets them bolt with taxpayer supplied capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
