Comments on: Inhofe And Fox News Anchor Bumble Through ‘Socialist Czar’ Talking Points http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/ Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Marci Davis http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-6016 Marci Davis Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:06:23 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-6016 Why are <strong>pro-pollution right wingers</strong> so socialist when it comes to military and industrial spending but get so bothered by social welfare and environmental protection? I think it's because they are <strong>Fascist</strong>. Why are pro-pollution right wingers so socialist when it comes to military and industrial spending but get so bothered by social welfare and environmental protection?
I think it’s because they are Fascist.

]]> By: Bob http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-6004 Bob Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:28:31 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-6004 Ooh, you BAD, Larry (#4)! Guns trump brains ANYTIME! BTW, how did religion get into this? Ooh, you BAD, Larry (#4)! Guns trump brains ANYTIME! BTW, how did religion get into this?

]]> By: Larry http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-5974 Larry Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:02:51 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-5974 I promise that if your global warming religion does not stay out of my pocket... I will be the first to join the militia that rebels against your religion. I promise that if your global warming religion does not stay out of my pocket… I will be the first to join the militia that rebels against your religion.

]]> By: ImagineReality http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-5798 ImagineReality Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:21:18 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-5798 The list is highly sketchy. You're not going to find many US Scientists at many colleges/universities that you're familiar with. Beyond that, many people on the list wish not to be on the list. They say Inhofe and others have taken their views out of context. It's funny Inhofe cites the list of scientists as evidence, because he and others on his committee created the list! Reminds me of Cheney citing the Washington Times article that was written on information he gave them (in order to make the case for the war in Iraq). The list is highly sketchy. You’re not going to find many US Scientists at many colleges/universities that you’re familiar with. Beyond that, many people on the list wish not to be on the list. They say Inhofe and others have taken their views out of context. It’s funny Inhofe cites the list of scientists as evidence, because he and others on his committee created the list! Reminds me of Cheney citing the Washington Times article that was written on information he gave them (in order to make the case for the war in Iraq).

]]> By: Ozymandias http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-5670 Ozymandias Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:33 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-5670 I think what disturbed me the most was Inhofe's declarations about Global Warming. He claims to have 650 scientists that have reversed their positions? Who are these scientists and is that true? I think what disturbed me the most was Inhofe’s declarations about Global Warming. He claims to have 650 scientists that have reversed their positions? Who are these scientists and is that true?

]]> By: Michael Lafferty http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/comment-page-1/#comment-5672 Michael Lafferty Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:09:28 +0000 http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/01/14/inhofe-extreme-socialist/#comment-5672 A reasonable question in some quarters, I imagine. And here's another: 'Where do you draw the line between a dumb b*tch and a news anchor?' Well, on its face, that question seem just as reasonable… Even it it is unreasonable and inappropriate to apply such a term to someone. FOX News continues to fish for the bottom, dumbing down the conversation. Can't we bring back the fairness doctrine? A reasonable question in some quarters, I imagine. And here’s another:

‘Where do you draw the line between a dumb b*tch and a news anchor?’ Well, on its face, that question seem just as reasonable…

Even it it is unreasonable and inappropriate to apply such a term to someone. FOX News continues to fish for the bottom, dumbing down the conversation. Can’t we bring back the fairness doctrine?

]]>