This morning, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly balefully intoned that Carol Browner, President-elect Barack Obama’s selection as his White House climate adviser, was “a leader of a socialist group.” As banners blared “BROWNER BELONGED TO SOCIALIST GROUP SEEKING ‘GLOBAL GOVERNANCE’” and “SOCIALIST TIES,” Kelly interviewed inveterate climate denier Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), who called Browner “pretty extremist” and wondered:
Where do you draw the line between an extreme liberal and a socialist?
Watch it:
The reality is, as the Wonk Room previously reported, that Browner was a member of the Commission for a Sustainable World Society (CSWS), a climate change policy working group established in 2007 by Socialist International (SI), a global coalition of left-leaning political parties. The commission involves top officials and political leaders from democratic allies of the United States, including Great Britain, Sweden, Germany, Spain, Mexico, India, and Brazil. In a typical overreach to sell their talking points, Kelly and Inhofe demonstrated a shoddy understanding of reality:
Kelly confused “global government” with “global governance.” The threat of a totalitarian “global government” is a bete noire of right-wing extremists and Apocalyptic evangelicals. Global governance, in contrast, is “the management of global processes in the absence of global government.”
Kelly falsely claimed the commission believes “rich countries like the United States have the obligation to shrink their economies” to fight global warming. In fact, the commission’s joint statements call for “unrestricted market access” and “the financing and investment required to promote low carbon economic growth,” and claim “new technologies go hand in hand with economic growth and development” and “a socially and ecologically sustainable society can create new opportunities for economic growth.”
Kelly falsely claimed Browner was “the head” of the commission. The co-chairs of the commission are Ricardo Lagos, former President of the Republic of Chile and a Special Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General on Climate Change, and Göran Persson, former Prime Minister of Sweden.
Inhofe falsely claimed that CSWS and SI are two separate organizations. Browner’s sole involvement with SI is her participation in the commission. Contra Inhofe, SI is not “another one she was involved in.”
Are Inhofe and Kelly confused, ill-informed, or do they simply not care what is actually the truth? The Wonk Room reports, you decide.


A reasonable question in some quarters, I imagine. And here’s another:
‘Where do you draw the line between a dumb b*tch and a news anchor?’ Well, on its face, that question seem just as reasonable…
Even it it is unreasonable and inappropriate to apply such a term to someone. FOX News continues to fish for the bottom, dumbing down the conversation. Can’t we bring back the fairness doctrine?
January 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pmI think what disturbed me the most was Inhofe’s declarations about Global Warming. He claims to have 650 scientists that have reversed their positions? Who are these scientists and is that true?
January 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pmThe list is highly sketchy. You’re not going to find many US Scientists at many colleges/universities that you’re familiar with. Beyond that, many people on the list wish not to be on the list. They say Inhofe and others have taken their views out of context. It’s funny Inhofe cites the list of scientists as evidence, because he and others on his committee created the list! Reminds me of Cheney citing the Washington Times article that was written on information he gave them (in order to make the case for the war in Iraq).
January 14th, 2009 at 10:21 pmI promise that if your global warming religion does not stay out of my pocket… I will be the first to join the militia that rebels against your religion.
January 15th, 2009 at 9:02 amOoh, you BAD, Larry (#4)! Guns trump brains ANYTIME! BTW, how did religion get into this?
January 15th, 2009 at 10:28 amWhy are pro-pollution right wingers so socialist when it comes to military and industrial spending but get so bothered by social welfare and environmental protection?
January 15th, 2009 at 11:06 amI think it’s because they are Fascist.