The Wonk Room

Energy Secretary Contender Dr. Steven Chu: Transform The Energy Landscape To Save ‘A Beautiful Planet’

The Washington Post’s Al Kamen reports that there’s “buzz” that the Obama transition is “looking hard at some scientific types” to lead the Energy Department. Dr. Steven Chu, the Nobel laureate director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is reportedly a dark horse candidate.

In a presentation at this summer’s National Clean Energy Summit convened by the University of Nevada Las Vegas, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), and the Center for American Progress Action Fund, Dr. Chu described why he has moved from his background in experimental quantum physics to tackling global warming:

Consider this. There’s about a 50 percent chance, the climate experts tell us, that in this century we will go up in temperature by three degrees Centigrade. Now, three degrees Centigrade doesn’t seem a lot to you, that’s 11° F. Chicago changes by 30° F in half a day. But 5° C means that … it’s the difference between where we are today and where we were in the last ice age. What did that mean? Canada, the United States down to Ohio and Pennsylvania, was covered in ice year round.

Five degrees Centigrade.

So think about what 5° C will mean going the other way. A very different world. So if you’d want that for your kids and grandkids, we can continue what we’re doing. Climate change of that scale will cause enormous resource wars, over water, arable land, and massive population displacements. We’re not talking about ten thousand people. We’re not talking about ten million people, we’re talking about hundreds of millions to billions of people being flooded out, permanently.

Watch it:

As Dr. Chu explains in the above video, the optimal way to reduce greenhouse emissions is to waste less energy, by investing in energy efficiency. He demolished the myth that we can’t reduce our use of energy without reducing our wealth by offering numerous counterexamples, or, in his scientist’s jargon, “existence proofs.” Applause broke out when he described how companies, after claiming efficiency gains and lowered costs were impossible, “miraculously” achieved them once they “had to assign the jobs from the lobbyists to the engineers.”

Chu continued by discussing what he has done to develop “new technologies to transform the landscape.” He discussed the Helios Project, the research initiative Berkeley Lab launched for breakthrough renewable energy and efficiency technology. In addition to research into energy conservation, Berkeley Lab researchers are pursuing nanotech photovoltaics, microbial and cellulosic biofuels, and chemical photosynthesis.

Dr. Chu concluded his address with a reminder why this challenge is so important:

I will leave you with this final image. This is — I was an undergraduate when this picture was taken by Apollo 8 — and it shows the moon and the Earth’s rise. A beautiful planet, a desolate moon. And focus on the fact that there’s nowhere else to go.

Earthrise






5 Responses to “Energy Secretary Contender Dr. Steven Chu: Transform The Energy Landscape To Save ‘A Beautiful Planet’”

  1. jonthebru Says:

    What can I do to get this guy on the job?
    In High School in 1969 I did a report on climate change and pollution. Now we may get serious, finally.


  2. jps Says:

    I like Chu’s thoughts on nuclear: Instead of trying to open Yucca Mountain, lets put all the excess nuclear waste in temporary distributed underground vaults until we’ve constructed the necessary equipment to reduce its half life to a few centuries. Does that decrease the chemical toxicity of the decay progeny as well? (And is there any way to know without waiting those few centuries?)

    In any case, a larger number of widely-distributed smaller underground dry cask storage vaults is a hell of a lot better than above-ground dry cask storage, and apparently more politically feasible than a Yucca Mountain-sized project. It’s basically what we have been doing, so let’s keep doing it. Since the economy is deflating, let’s spend a lot of money to build enough to eliminate above-ground dry cask storage from now until 2025.

    Nuclear power releases only 1% as much uranium as burning coal in the US, but none of the mercury.


  3. Reindeargirl Says:

    How about we avoid this toxic legacy left to some future wunderkids to “transmute” and NOT build anymore nuclear plants in this country. Other countries will figure it out for themselves when their sites start leaking into the groundwater like those in the US. This guy is smart enough to lead us to the clean energy promised land without any more nukes and it will be better for the economy too.


  4. psychedelic santa Says:

    “Now, three degrees Centigrade doesn’t seem a lot to you, that’s 11° F. ”

    That is not accurate.


  5. Kevin Gertgen Says:

    I just heard this guy’s “talk” on talk radio, and did a quick Google. This guy is an idiot. 3 Deg C = 5.4 Deg F, not 11 Deg F like he said. ANY “scientist” (any high school science teacher) would catch that mistake immediately.

    These are the people talking “cap and trade”, costing the global economy $ trillions. Yep, we’re in good hands, aren’t we.



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage