REPORT: Wage Erosion And The Decline Of Labor
REPORT: Wage Erosion And The Decline Of Labor
For some time, The Wonk Room has been making the case that income inequality is a real problem that is caused by stagnating wages and declining union numbers. This week, the International Labor Office (ILO) released its Global Wage Report for 2008/9, which shows that wages in the United States and around the world are declining, as are rates of unionization and collective bargaining. This is leading to more widespread income inequality, and all of its associated adverse effects.
The ILO found that between 1995 and 2007, real wage growth in the United States was essentially 0 percent, and in 2009 wages will “decline by 0.5 percent in industrial countries and grow by no more than 1.1 per cent globally.” The Center for American Progress Action Fund has found that weekly wages were actually 0.3 percent lower in June 2008 than they were in March 2001.
This stagnation — which occurred at the same time that CEO pay steadily increased — has led to severe income inequality. The ILO found that the U.S. is one of the countries in which “the gap between top and bottom wages has increased most rapidly.” Indeed, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reported recently that “in the United States, the richest 10 percent earn an average of US$93,000 — the highest level in the OECD. The poorest 10 percent earn an average of US$5,800 — about 20 percent lower than the OECD average.”
As the ILO pointed out, income inequity has serious economic consequences:
There are also many economic costs associated with higher inequality, such as higher crime rates, higher expenditures on private and public security, worse public health outcomes and lower average educational achievements. A growing body of studies also highlights the importance of reducing inequality to achieve poverty reduction.
Furthermore, as the Center for American Progress’ Sabina Dewan explained, “declining wages means a decrease in purchasing power and a slowing down of global consumption at a time when the wheels of the world’s economic engine are already grinding to a halt.”
To alter the downward trajectory of wages, the ILO makes two suggestions: better designed and managed minimum wage laws and stronger collective bargaining for workers. A step that could be taken here in the U.S. to make stronger bargaining possible is passing the Employee Free Choice Act, which would help to ease the path toward unionization — and thus higher wages and better benefits — for America’s workers.
6 Responses to “REPORT: Wage Erosion And The Decline Of Labor”
Register
RSSLogin
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog RollAbout Wonk RoomContact Us
Donate
While CEO pay continues to be an issue, what about VPs, Board of Directors pay, and other senior management? I haven’t seen any studies on this. Demonizing CEO really doesn’t show the whole salary picture IMO.
November 27th, 2008 at 12:51 pmWhich organizations are pushing Congress to recognize unionization by signing an assent card? Which congresspeople have taken the correct stand on this issue and what is the bill number we should be calling our local congressional representation asking them to cosponsor?
November 27th, 2008 at 6:29 pmTwo points:
1) There is a reason why our political elections are done by secret ballot; it is the same reason why union elections/formations are the same way. If someone does not want a union to be formed they should not be called out on it.
2) If the bottom 10% make $5800 and are working 40 hours a week they are getting $2.70/hr. I don’ think these numbers tell the full story.
November 28th, 2008 at 1:37 pmActionJackson:
For what reason do you suggest that anyone voluntarily relinquishing their right to collective bargaining should retain the right to anonymity? The First Amendment protects the rights of associations to form under the charter of their members’ choosing, and if the members choose to make their roster public, any restrictions on that right is clearly unconstitutional and the legislature needs to make that abundantly clear.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act (H.R. 800, S. 1041)
If you have a problem with income disparity and the decline of real wages, I suggest you examine your economic beliefs from first principles.
December 1st, 2008 at 3:55 am[should be "are clearly unconstitutional" -- subject-verb agreement]
December 1st, 2008 at 3:57 amEconomic polarization is at the root of The 9/22/08 Economic Crisis. Causes: 1. redistribution to CEOs and executives, 2. “free trade” offshoring undermining wages, 3. Fed policy undermining wages & unions: There’s no ‘free market’ for Labor, 4. Increased regressive taxation, decreased progressive taxation, 5. Mortgage fraud with brokers pushing people into unsustainable fixed-rate balloon loans to pump up fees. The US economy is dying: Jobs & ‘Trade’ Data Update Oct08.
Anti-union forces oppose The Employee Free Choice Act on the basis that it would bring worker intimidation, but the existing, vicious intimidation comes from corporations that fire union organizers in a heartbeat with little or no penalty.
December 1st, 2008 at 2:01 pm