The Wonk Room

Bernanke Acts While Paulson Dithers

By Pat Garofalo on Nov 25th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

Bernanke Acts While Paulson Dithers

bernpaul1.jpgToday, in yet another transformation of the ever-changing Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced that he will commit $20 billion of TARP funds to a plan being implemented by the New York Fed that is aimed at easing the current credit crunch. The NY Fed’s program is “meant to ensure that banks and other institutions remain willing to lend to creditworthy consumers,” by extending relief to holders of “auto loans, student loans, credit card loans, or small business loans.”

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke is finally taking a step that Paulson won’t, and spending $600 billion to revive the U.S. housing market. $100 billion will be designated to buy the debt of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and another $500 billion to buy mortgage-backed securities that are guaranteed by Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie Mae. According to the Fed, the program will be conducted “through a series of competitive auctions,” thereby establishing a price for some of the unpriced toxic assets kicking around those institutions alongside their more credit-worthy holdings.

Paulson, remarkably, still seems to be unwilling to do anything with TARP funds that might aid homeowners. And while Bernanke’s step is a start, akin to other actions by Fannie and Freddie, it still does not effect mortgages held outside of the GSE’s.

As Andrew Jakabovics pointed out, the Center for American Progress has for some time advocated shifting toxic mortgages “into the hands of an entity able and willing to make the necessary modifications to provide benefits to homeowners and investors alike“:

The discount at which mortgage-backed securities are currently valued in the secondary market by institutional investors provides ample room for modifications to be made while still offering Treasury — and by extension the taxpayers — a reasonable return on these investments.

Matthew Yglesias noted that, “despite the infuriatingly bad implementation and continuing dire situation, the passage of the $700 billion rescue package did in fact help avert a greater disaster.” Indeed, the consequences of doing nothing would likely have made the current situation an enviable one. Still, Paulson’s “ready, fire, aim” approach to addressing the financial crisis has left the Fed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) to do the best that they can with their more limited tools.

Update CAPAF's Ed Paisley notes that Paulson may be pushed toward a solution:
These and other measures to help stabilize the housing market and then address the root cause of our economy’s present ills is what Congress envisioned when it passed its $700 billion financial rescue package earlier this fall. Paulson should get with the program in the remaining weeks of his tenure at Treasury.





4 Responses to “Bernanke Acts While Paulson Dithers”

  1. stateofthedivision Says:

    While Hank has not been very transparent or forthcoming, the Fed had less of a legal obligation to do so.

    This is a way to hide specifics.


  2. jps Says:

    The Fed is required by law to sustain price and employment stability. Price stability means inflation around 1.5%. Employment stability has traditionally meant unemployment around 5%, but 2.5% would be better because the 5% figure is a holdout from when everyone looked jobs out of limited-circulation newspapers and the trade press instead of broader search engines like Craigslist.

    I hope Obama realizes that when he sees his “save or create 2.5 million jobs” plan is going tepid. I hope he isn’t too timid about it. I hope Romer and Krugman can explain it to him.


  3. gab Says:

    As cycnical as it sounds, the feds shouldn’t bail out the homeowners. They made bad decisions. The people who made the right decisions shouldn’t have to pay for the fools’ mistakes.


  4. jps Says:

    gab: That’s easier said than done. Because we have Wal-Marted our manufacturing base offshore, the economy is currently two thirds comprised of consumer spending. If those consumers who own homes are punished for eating the forbidden fruit of easy credit back when unregulated credit rating agencies were signing off on bundling their no-money-down, interest-only stupidity, then we all suffer. And who exactly made the mistake here — the low-income home buyers or the credit rating agencies enabling them? We could argue about it all day but solving the underlying problems is the order of the day.



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage