Comments on: PNAC: Palin’s Pentagon In Waiting?

By: b williams

b williams — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:51:36 +0000

The neocons and republicans knew that the GOP party would fail because of the coming (back then) Economic Crisis (foreknowledge), and due to Bush’s low ratings. So they pulled Mitt Romney from the race and let the “old man” have it…to fail, then counting on a disgruntled America, after socialist Democratic leadership through a bad economy, to re-elect them again in 2012. (This is also the belief of Michael Savage, that McCain was thrown in to lose, and explains Romney’s weird departure).

By: Paul Allen

Paul Allen — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:49:00 +0000

I see that these very evil people are still proud of their 2000 paper. It expanded upon the 1992 Cheney/Wolfowitz plan of invading Iraq to steal its oil by adding resources from countries around the world.

It talks of the process of transforming the US military into a bunch of marauding thugs and says:

[...] the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.

America’s “new Pearl Harbor” happened on 9/11. A day when Dick Cheney was running two separate war games exercises (normally held months apart) which prevented any interception of the hijacked aircraft.

Wow! It couldn’t have worked out any better for the Bush maladministration if they’d planned it to happen that way.

By: OleHippieChick

OleHippieChick — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:41:04 +0000

Shallow enough? My. A “potential future leader” only because William the Bloody wanted to hump her leg. Pfft. Fame is cheap.

By: Michael Lafferty

Michael Lafferty — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:06:46 +0000

William Kristol’s long association with such out of the mainstream efforts and his behavior as a McCain campaign adviser very strongly suggest that the New York Times should look elsewhere for a conservative commentator.

Kristol remains little more than a mouthpiece for his favorite discredited causes, and does little or nothing for the New York Times as a contributor.

That, and—seriously—he simply is not a good writer. His diatribes barely reach above the level of those of Jonah Goldberg.