<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dingell&#8217;s Supporters Backed By Pollution Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cargocult</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>cargocult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>Not only that, Dingell&#039;s biggest lifetime supporter is the electric utilites industry, which relies on coal for over 50% of their output.  They don&#039;t want to be forced to close down coal plants and build wind turbines, solar PV systems, and energy-balancing smart grids - even though it would generate thousands of jobs - it&#039;s your basic fear of change.

Dingell&#039;s lifetime contributions from fossil fuel-related sectors (opensecrets):
directly related:
Electric Utilities - $1,169,547
Automotive - $897,915
Oil &amp; Gas - $394,591
indirectly related:
Lobbyists - $538,687
Securities &amp; Investment - $510,779

Dingell is one of the main reasons that nothing ever came of the Democrat&#039;s 2006 election promises - they were going to remove the fossil fuel subsidies and pass a &quot;Clean Energy Jobs Bill&quot; - and their failure to do so is why Congress had even lower ratings than Bush did.  Dingell used his committe chair to sabotage and water down clean energy legislation - he should definitely go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, Dingell&#8217;s biggest lifetime supporter is the electric utilites industry, which relies on coal for over 50% of their output.  They don&#8217;t want to be forced to close down coal plants and build wind turbines, solar PV systems, and energy-balancing smart grids &#8211; even though it would generate thousands of jobs &#8211; it&#8217;s your basic fear of change.</p>
<p>Dingell&#8217;s lifetime contributions from fossil fuel-related sectors (opensecrets):<br />
directly related:<br />
Electric Utilities &#8211; $1,169,547<br />
Automotive &#8211; $897,915<br />
Oil &amp; Gas &#8211; $394,591<br />
indirectly related:<br />
Lobbyists &#8211; $538,687<br />
Securities &amp; Investment &#8211; $510,779</p>
<p>Dingell is one of the main reasons that nothing ever came of the Democrat&#8217;s 2006 election promises &#8211; they were going to remove the fossil fuel subsidies and pass a &#8220;Clean Energy Jobs Bill&#8221; &#8211; and their failure to do so is why Congress had even lower ratings than Bush did.  Dingell used his committe chair to sabotage and water down clean energy legislation &#8211; he should definitely go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa Williamson</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/11/10/dingell-pollution-money/#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>Given that 25% of children in Rangel&#039;s district have asthma, a problem dramatically worsened by the traffic fumes in Harlem, you&#039;d think Rangel would be better than this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that 25% of children in Rangel&#8217;s district have asthma, a problem dramatically worsened by the traffic fumes in Harlem, you&#8217;d think Rangel would be better than this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
