The Wonk Room

McCain Confuses Coal With ‘Clean Coal’ In New Ads

On a day when Congress focuses on the deteriorating financial markets, John McCain has given up his pledge to stay in Washington to get a deal done. Instead, back on the campaign trail, he wants to talk about coal. McCain is selling a fantasy of a coal- and oil-based economy, in ads airing in Colorado, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia:

“Clean coal” is important to America. And to Colorado. For Coloradoans, coal means thousands of jobs. Economic growth. More affordable electricity. For America, coal means energy independence. And “clean coal” means cleaner air. But Obama-Biden and their liberal allies oppose “clean coal.”

Listen here:

In fact, coal is a dirty, deadly fuel that is becoming increasingly expensive. And a coal-based economy doesn’t promise real job growth, either. The coal industry has in fact been cutting jobs while increasing production and profits. Finally, continued use of coal — as the most concentrated global warming pollutant — is threatening the future of human civilization, something McCain himself seems to recognize.

McCain’s ads confuse coal with “clean coal” — the industry’s preferred term for technologies still in development to sequester coal’s deadly pollution. Such advanced coal technology may promise “cleaner air” — in comparison to the continued use of traditional coal plants — if and when it is developed. The “clean coal” propaganda campaign must not substitute for real technological innovation. This is what Al Gore meant when he said last week:

If the coal companies can actually sequester CO2 safely, then okay. But don’t, don’t pretend to do it. Don’t, don’t, don’t give us this illusion. Because that’s what they did on Wall Street. “The risk isn’t there. Don’t worry about it. Just keep focusing on the short term profit.”

This is why the Center for American Progress Action Fund advocates strong emissions standards for new coal plant construction and a rigorous investment in advanced coal technology research and development. For true job growth and cleaner air, the Center for American Progress Action Fund is recommending the implementation of a $100 billion Green Recovery stimulus that puts our economy back on track by driving investment in green jobs. In the states McCain is running his “clean coal” ads:

COLORADO: $1.7 billion investment in green recovery: 32,849 jobs (vs. 16,000 coal-related jobs)

OHIO: $3.7 billion investment in green recovery: 80,360 jobs (vs. 18,500 coal-related jobs)

PENNSYLVANIA: $4 billion investment in green recovery: 86,385 jobs (vs. 47,600 coal-related jobs)

VIRGINIA: $2.7 billion investment in green recovery: 56,459 jobs (vs. 29,400 coal-related jobs)

The coal job numbers come from generous estimates for 2005 published by the coal industry’s lobbying group, the National Mining Association.

Unfortunately, lost in the chaos of the bailout negotiations for the financial sector has been Congress’s failure to extend the needed green job tax credits over conservative opposition.

Transcript:

ANNOUNCER: “Clean coal” is important to America. And to Colorado. For Coloradoans, coal means thousands of jobs. Economic growth. More affordable electricity. For America, coal means energy independence. And “clean coal” means cleaner air. But Obama-Biden and their liberal allies oppose “clean coal.” Listen to Joe Biden.

JOE BIDEN: “No coal plants here in America.” “We’re not supporting clean coal.”

ANNOUNCER: No coal plants in America? No jobs in Colorado? No energy independence for America? It’s no surprise. After all, Obama-Biden and their liberal allies opposed off-shore drilling. Congressional liberals blocked off-shore drilling putting special interests, before our interests. Obama-Biden and their liberal allies. Too risky for our jobs, our economic future. Paid for by McCain-Palin 2008 and the Republican National Committee.

JOHN MCCAIN: I’m John McCain and I approved this message.






2 Responses to “McCain Confuses Coal With ‘Clean Coal’ In New Ads”

  1. stateofthedivision Says:

    Wow, more mixing terms and lying? What a surprise!


  2. 905134148 Says:

    I don’t understand why clean coal can be a ‘bad thing’. Coal is by far the cheapest resource of energy and it powers 50% of America. Why abandon a cheap and effective energy source while it is on the brink of possibly becoming a very clean derivative, as it has gradually done in the past few decades. If coal can become clean, would it not be extremely effective? You can’t just replace the energy of half of America, especially through solar/wind power which is still very underdeveloped. Get rid of coal…now what?



Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage