<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Value of McCain’s Health Care Tax Credit = One Designer Jacket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/09/17/health-jacket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/09/17/health-jacket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: naugiedoggie</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/09/17/health-jacket/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>naugiedoggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/09/17/health-jacket/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>I think the expression &quot;tax credit&quot; used repeatedly in stories about McBush&#039;s healthcare &quot;plan&quot; is misleading.  A &quot;tax credit&quot; is a straight reduction of your liability.  So if you owe $14,500 in taxes, a tax credit reduces your liability to $12,000.  However, a &quot;healthcare deduction&quot; means that when you are computing your liability, you put down $2,500 as the McBush healthcare deduction ... after you have added the $4,000 in benefit payments into your income.  In this scenario, your taxes will probably go up because the additional $1,500 in income will push you into the next tax bracket.

The reason I bring this up is that a strictly-speaking &quot;tax credit&quot; would break the budget -- because there is no way that an increase in income of $4,000 is going to come out as an increase in liability of $2,500.  The result would be a massive hemorrhage of funds from the Treasury.  We couldn&#039;t afford it and not even a Republican-controlled Congress would approve it.

So, I&#039;m pretty sure that what is envisioned (and discussed) is not a tax credit, but a healthcare deduction.

Thanks.

mp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the expression &#8220;tax credit&#8221; used repeatedly in stories about McBush&#8217;s healthcare &#8220;plan&#8221; is misleading.  A &#8220;tax credit&#8221; is a straight reduction of your liability.  So if you owe $14,500 in taxes, a tax credit reduces your liability to $12,000.  However, a &#8220;healthcare deduction&#8221; means that when you are computing your liability, you put down $2,500 as the McBush healthcare deduction &#8230; after you have added the $4,000 in benefit payments into your income.  In this scenario, your taxes will probably go up because the additional $1,500 in income will push you into the next tax bracket.</p>
<p>The reason I bring this up is that a strictly-speaking &#8220;tax credit&#8221; would break the budget &#8212; because there is no way that an increase in income of $4,000 is going to come out as an increase in liability of $2,500.  The result would be a massive hemorrhage of funds from the Treasury.  We couldn&#8217;t afford it and not even a Republican-controlled Congress would approve it.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m pretty sure that what is envisioned (and discussed) is not a tax credit, but a healthcare deduction.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>mp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/09/17/health-jacket/comment-page-1/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/09/17/health-jacket/#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>Our leaders now behave like monarchs in third world countries.  &quot;We have ours, let the little people suffer.&quot;

For the federal government to mobilize over $310 billion in a few short weeks to save the health of four firms, is an affront to the millions of uninsureds, waiting eight years for relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our leaders now behave like monarchs in third world countries.  &#8220;We have ours, let the little people suffer.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the federal government to mobilize over $310 billion in a few short weeks to save the health of four firms, is an affront to the millions of uninsureds, waiting eight years for relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
