<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two-Thirds of Corporations Pay No Taxes, But McCain Still Wants To Lower the Corporate Tax Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: celexa</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-151477</link>
		<dc:creator>celexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/#comment-151477</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/StewartBrandons#1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;after clomid&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/StewartBrandons#1" rel="nofollow">after clomid</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engineerboy</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>engineerboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see a more detailed analysis of these companies.  Such as C-corp vs. S-Corp. vs. LLC etc. What are the percentages based on ranges of profit and total sales ($$$). 

My reason is the tag line &quot;Two thirds of companies pay no taxes...&quot; is what most people focus on yet, not knowing that (like what fletc3her mentioned above) S-Corp status pass the losses to the shareholder&#039;s personal tax returns.  It my personal belief that the GOP don&#039;t truly support the small business owner.  They don&#039;t what us lowly engineers to be anything other than subservient button pushers.  Otherwise, it would be MUCH easier to start a business and keep it going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a more detailed analysis of these companies.  Such as C-corp vs. S-Corp. vs. LLC etc. What are the percentages based on ranges of profit and total sales ($$$). </p>
<p>My reason is the tag line &#8220;Two thirds of companies pay no taxes&#8230;&#8221; is what most people focus on yet, not knowing that (like what fletc3her mentioned above) S-Corp status pass the losses to the shareholder&#8217;s personal tax returns.  It my personal belief that the GOP don&#8217;t truly support the small business owner.  They don&#8217;t what us lowly engineers to be anything other than subservient button pushers.  Otherwise, it would be MUCH easier to start a business and keep it going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fletc3her</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>fletc3her</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>I find one detail from this report very misleading.  It talks about S-Corporations as an example of corporations that don&#039;t pay taxes.  However, these corporations pass through their profits to the individual shareholders of the corporation.  Corporate profits are taxed as part of the individual tax returns.

Here&#039;s an example of how this works.  Say your corporation pays four shareholders $50,000 a year salary (and may pay other non shareholders as well).  If the corporation has $200,000 in the bank account at the end of the year then $50,000 of that &quot;profit&quot; is added to each shareholder&#039;s individual return.  Their income is reported at $100,000 for the year.  This occurs even if the &quot;profit&quot; is not distributed to the shareholders.  The tax is paid even if that money stays in the bank to cover the next year&#039;s expenses or to help the corporation get past an economic downturn.

That money raises each of the shareholders from the 25% to the 28% tax rate so the corporate profits are effectively taxed at 28%.  This is less than the 39% tax rate which a normal corporation would pay on that money.  But, it still is most definitely not a case of the corporation dodging taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find one detail from this report very misleading.  It talks about S-Corporations as an example of corporations that don&#8217;t pay taxes.  However, these corporations pass through their profits to the individual shareholders of the corporation.  Corporate profits are taxed as part of the individual tax returns.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of how this works.  Say your corporation pays four shareholders $50,000 a year salary (and may pay other non shareholders as well).  If the corporation has $200,000 in the bank account at the end of the year then $50,000 of that &#8220;profit&#8221; is added to each shareholder&#8217;s individual return.  Their income is reported at $100,000 for the year.  This occurs even if the &#8220;profit&#8221; is not distributed to the shareholders.  The tax is paid even if that money stays in the bank to cover the next year&#8217;s expenses or to help the corporation get past an economic downturn.</p>
<p>That money raises each of the shareholders from the 25% to the 28% tax rate so the corporate profits are effectively taxed at 28%.  This is less than the 39% tax rate which a normal corporation would pay on that money.  But, it still is most definitely not a case of the corporation dodging taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/08/12/no-corporate-taxes/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>While the practice of shifting tax obligations through such techniques as moving operations offshore, and maximizing the many benefits which accrue to corporations is shameful, it&#039;s important to understand that not all corporations are equal with regards to tax obligations. While C-corporations are taxed at corporate rates, it is the participants of S-corporations who are taxed at their marginal rates—rather than the corporation—and therefore, the simplistic label corporation in such dicussions is meaningless.

The tendency to lump all corporations together creates the clearly mistaken impression that many or most corporations are actively working to avoid paying taxes which they are obligated to pay when, in many cases, there is no corporate  tax obligation whatsoever.

There is widespread abuse of corporate taxation in all forms, including among S-corporations, limited liability and professional corporations. But, it is not helpful to the discussion to create the overarching impression that all corporations are engaged in tax avoidance when, in fact, this is not the case. All corporations, it turns out, are not created equal with regard to taxation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the practice of shifting tax obligations through such techniques as moving operations offshore, and maximizing the many benefits which accrue to corporations is shameful, it&#8217;s important to understand that not all corporations are equal with regards to tax obligations. While C-corporations are taxed at corporate rates, it is the participants of S-corporations who are taxed at their marginal rates—rather than the corporation—and therefore, the simplistic label corporation in such dicussions is meaningless.</p>
<p>The tendency to lump all corporations together creates the clearly mistaken impression that many or most corporations are actively working to avoid paying taxes which they are obligated to pay when, in many cases, there is no corporate  tax obligation whatsoever.</p>
<p>There is widespread abuse of corporate taxation in all forms, including among S-corporations, limited liability and professional corporations. But, it is not helpful to the discussion to create the overarching impression that all corporations are engaged in tax avoidance when, in fact, this is not the case. All corporations, it turns out, are not created equal with regard to taxation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
