<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Burnett &#8212; The John Yoo Of The EPA &#8212; Steps Down [UPDATED]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:21:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah78</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Dave28, judging by your condescending and sexist rhetoric, I doubt that you would ever admit the errors of your ways. Nonetheless, I feel it appropriate to point out that the arsenic report did in fact take into account all of those other concerns. Have you even read it? A cost-benefit analysis is precisely the mechanism with which any person or organization is able to determine whether a given action or policy is the correct one. &quot;Cost&quot; does not equal &quot;dollars&quot; - Econ 101. Regarding your point about people taking action only when someone close is harmed, you are correct. But as this blog is about Mr. Burnett, I suggest you look at his actual record and involvement with environmental issues before you open your mouth. And finally, your tone and sarcasm is really quite immature. I hope this approach isn&#039;t really the way you intend to make your difference in this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave28, judging by your condescending and sexist rhetoric, I doubt that you would ever admit the errors of your ways. Nonetheless, I feel it appropriate to point out that the arsenic report did in fact take into account all of those other concerns. Have you even read it? A cost-benefit analysis is precisely the mechanism with which any person or organization is able to determine whether a given action or policy is the correct one. &#8220;Cost&#8221; does not equal &#8220;dollars&#8221; &#8211; Econ 101. Regarding your point about people taking action only when someone close is harmed, you are correct. But as this blog is about Mr. Burnett, I suggest you look at his actual record and involvement with environmental issues before you open your mouth. And finally, your tone and sarcasm is really quite immature. I hope this approach isn&#8217;t really the way you intend to make your difference in this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave28</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>dave28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>lauren...your lack of care far outreaches any validity within your comments.  Did you decide not to include the standards/calculations/results of injurious impact, you know, people who don&#039;t die but get sick?  No, because it doesn&#039;t serve YOUR cause.  

Anyone who cares about (human) life knows that the gov&#039;ts role is to protect its people, not cost-benefit analysis its people into areas of risk and harm.  Really, it is individuals ignorant to the role of gov&#039;t who put us all at risk via &quot;lawyer environmentalism&quot; and &quot;corporate favoritism&quot;, and by supporting those who mean to do us harm for profit.  It usually takes someone from your own circle - family/friends - becoming harmed before you&#039;ll figure out what many already know, that the fight is a good one and corporations will send us to our graves if they can make a profit at it.  

The short version (sorry to have wasted your time) is - your head is planted in your backside, deary....ignoring imminent danger is a sign of intelligence...condoning those who collude to harm is spitting on humanity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lauren&#8230;your lack of care far outreaches any validity within your comments.  Did you decide not to include the standards/calculations/results of injurious impact, you know, people who don&#8217;t die but get sick?  No, because it doesn&#8217;t serve YOUR cause.  </p>
<p>Anyone who cares about (human) life knows that the gov&#8217;ts role is to protect its people, not cost-benefit analysis its people into areas of risk and harm.  Really, it is individuals ignorant to the role of gov&#8217;t who put us all at risk via &#8220;lawyer environmentalism&#8221; and &#8220;corporate favoritism&#8221;, and by supporting those who mean to do us harm for profit.  It usually takes someone from your own circle &#8211; family/friends &#8211; becoming harmed before you&#8217;ll figure out what many already know, that the fight is a good one and corporations will send us to our graves if they can make a profit at it.  </p>
<p>The short version (sorry to have wasted your time) is &#8211; your head is planted in your backside, deary&#8230;.ignoring imminent danger is a sign of intelligence&#8230;condoning those who collude to harm is spitting on humanity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Your accusations are shameful and wrong. If you actually read the report about arsenic, you would see that the authors argue the rule &quot;is likely to result in a net LOSS of about ten lives annually.&quot; I realize you failed to mention that because it undermines your argument, but you should have nonetheless. Regarding mercury and soot, I fail to even follow your accusatory logic. And finally, did you even bother to understand WHY Burnett stepped down from the EPA? Your suggestion of &quot;climate content&quot; shows how ignorant and uninformed you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your accusations are shameful and wrong. If you actually read the report about arsenic, you would see that the authors argue the rule &#8220;is likely to result in a net LOSS of about ten lives annually.&#8221; I realize you failed to mention that because it undermines your argument, but you should have nonetheless. Regarding mercury and soot, I fail to even follow your accusatory logic. And finally, did you even bother to understand WHY Burnett stepped down from the EPA? Your suggestion of &#8220;climate content&#8221; shows how ignorant and uninformed you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevedwight</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>stevedwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/05/07/burnett-yoo-of-epa/#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Jason, don&#039;t worry about your unemployment problem.  I&#039;ve heard the American Enterprise Institute is looking for fellows and scholars.  Please apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, don&#8217;t worry about your unemployment problem.  I&#8217;ve heard the American Enterprise Institute is looking for fellows and scholars.  Please apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
