President Bush just delivered his Rose Garden global warming speech:
If we fully implement our strong new laws, adhere to the principles I’ve outlined, and adopt appropriate incentives, we will put America on an ambitious new track for greenhouse gas reductions. The growth in emissions will slow over the next decade, stop by 2025, and begin to reverse thereafter, so long as technology continues to advance.
At the White House press briefing today, James Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, heaped praise on Bush’s plan:
I would just observe, Europe as a union has stated a mid-term goal. They are working on how they’re going to implement that in each member state. Canada has stated a mid-term goal. The United States has now stated a mid-term goal.
We are the only three that have done that so far, but we know that all of the other major economies are working on it, and so we’re giving our own signal about how we’re structuring what we’re going to do, and hopefully they’ll reflect off of that and make appropriate decisions for their economies as well.
Let’s review:
| EUROPE | CANADA | UNITED STATES | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Target For Greenhouse Emissions | 20% below 1990 levels | 1990 levels | No target; keep increasing until 2025 |
| Mechanism | Mandatory cap-and-trade system, performance standards, international offsets | Voluntary efficiency standards | Tax cuts for industry |
Vice President Al Gore rightly described Canada’s plan when the Conservative government released it last year as “a complete and total fraud.” Bush’s proposal is sheer lunacy.
Bush’s plan, if the rest of the world followed suit, would push the planet into territory never before seen in the history of human civilization. For his senior environmental adviser to even compare this to Europe’s mandatory and unilateral commitment to aggressive greenhouse reductions is beyond shameful.
UPDATE: Climate Progress and Gristmill have more. The U.S. Climate Action Network links to responses from member organizations, including the Center for American Progress.
UPDATE II: Warming Law notes Bush’s astounding contempt for the Supreme Court.
UPDATE III: Responses from House global warming committee chairman Ed Markey (D-MA), Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and ranking member James Inhofe (R-OK), Campaign for America’s Future, and Energy Smart.


Boxer:
Inhofe:
April 16th, 2008 at 4:59 pmAs per Inhofe, we should worry that what this really is about is to make Lieberman-Warner seem like it is coming from an environmentalist perspective, that it is somehow a strong/radical bill. Thus, we will have Lieberman-Warner (which is a bad bill, which fails on basic principle grounds re what is necessary) portrayed as the ‘radical’ solution, Bush as the not enough, and John McCain will come in with a diastrous middle ground as the cowboy to rescue the nation. It is a myth, much worse in policy-making than on TV.
April 16th, 2008 at 5:03 pmDon’t miss Al Gore’s brand-new slideshow: How Dare We Be Optimistic?
An inspirational (and alarming) talk on climate change and what our generation can (and must) do about it, together.
excerpt from the show:
From the TED website, where you can see Gore’s presentation:
Alliance for Climate Protection, which is launching a nationwide, grassroots campaign to end Global Warming, [I believe it is sponsored by Gore] and invites our help!
April 16th, 2008 at 7:34 pm