<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gore Launches $300 Million Climate Action Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/31/announcing-we-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/31/announcing-we-campaign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa Williamson</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/31/announcing-we-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/31/announcing-we-campaign/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>The Gore site is actually pretty cool (although the pop-up talking heads are bizarre).  And it&#039;s great to have a widespread positive message about achievable solutions to global warming.  (It&#039;s about time.)

But I worry that the Gore campaign isn&#039;t distinguishing themselves enough from the more clever and subtle advertising of the companies their &quot;up against.&quot; The Gore ad doesn&#039;t look that different from half to Chevron ads I&#039;ve seen.  

Someone needs to be telling the American people that there&#039;s a right and a wrong way to address global warming.  This ad campaign is a start, I guess.  People have to believe the problem can be solved at all.  But I worry that in the meantime, we&#039;re going to have started paying off polluters instead of making them pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gore site is actually pretty cool (although the pop-up talking heads are bizarre).  And it&#8217;s great to have a widespread positive message about achievable solutions to global warming.  (It&#8217;s about time.)</p>
<p>But I worry that the Gore campaign isn&#8217;t distinguishing themselves enough from the more clever and subtle advertising of the companies their &#8220;up against.&#8221; The Gore ad doesn&#8217;t look that different from half to Chevron ads I&#8217;ve seen.  </p>
<p>Someone needs to be telling the American people that there&#8217;s a right and a wrong way to address global warming.  This ad campaign is a start, I guess.  People have to believe the problem can be solved at all.  But I worry that in the meantime, we&#8217;re going to have started paying off polluters instead of making them pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
