Today, former Vice President Al Gore and his organization, the Alliance for Climate Protection, launched a $300 million, three-year campaign with the goal of “educating people in the US and around the world that the climate crisis is both urgent and solvable.” The Washington Post reports that the “We” campaign “aims to enlist 10 million volunteers through a combination of network and cable commercials, display ads…and online social networks.” Gore told 60 Minutes he and his wife Tipper had donated the Nobel Peace Prize money and all the profits from his documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” to this new campaign.
The campaign’s website, wecansolveit.org, includes action alerts, blogger outreach, and the message of a “clean energy economy” fueled by energy efficiency and renewable energy.
The campaign will launch TV advertisements later this week that “will team up offbeat celebrity couples who may not have much in common but share a belief that it is important to address climate change,” including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and former Speaker Newt Gingrich, Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson, and the Dixie Chicks and Toby Keith. Sign up for the campaign, and watch its debut ad:
The Alliance’s spending of $100 million per year on a public advocacy campaign may be without precedent. However, the public is being bombarded with propaganda from the industries whose emissions are causing global warming and thus have the most to lose — or gain — from how the United States regulates greenhouse gas pollution. Here’s a look at what Gore’s campaign is up against:


The Gore site is actually pretty cool (although the pop-up talking heads are bizarre). And it’s great to have a widespread positive message about achievable solutions to global warming. (It’s about time.)
But I worry that the Gore campaign isn’t distinguishing themselves enough from the more clever and subtle advertising of the companies their “up against.” The Gore ad doesn’t look that different from half to Chevron ads I’ve seen.
Someone needs to be telling the American people that there’s a right and a wrong way to address global warming. This ad campaign is a start, I guess. People have to believe the problem can be solved at all. But I worry that in the meantime, we’re going to have started paying off polluters instead of making them pay.
March 31st, 2008 at 6:20 pm