<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Escalation Architect Fred Kagan Doubles Down On His Claim That Sectarian Cleansing In Baghdad Is A &#8216;Myth&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kgprophet</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Kgprophet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>There you guys go again, attacking these people&#039;s talking points with &lt;em&gt;facts&lt;/em&gt;.  Then you bring up these &quot;&lt;em&gt;statistics&lt;/em&gt;&quot; about over a 2 million Iraqis displaced and tens of thousands killed from sectarian violence as some kind of argument that things aren&#039;t going so great in Iraq? 

Where do you get this idea that facts are a way to win an argument?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you guys go again, attacking these people&#8217;s talking points with <em>facts</em>.  Then you bring up these &#8220;<em>statistics</em>&#8221; about over a 2 million Iraqis displaced and tens of thousands killed from sectarian violence as some kind of argument that things aren&#8217;t going so great in Iraq? </p>
<p>Where do you get this idea that facts are a way to win an argument?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thirdparty</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>thirdparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Kagan said that the myth is that the cleansing was &lt;strong&gt;completed&lt;/strong&gt;. He backs it up by demonstrating that there are still mixed neighborhoods in Baghdad. Both claims are true, and not once does he claim that there has not been sectarian cleansing or a reduction of mixed cities; simply put, he&#039;s pointing out the reality that the cleansing was never &quot;completed,&quot; as indicated by your maps. 

I challenge anyone to break down what Kagan said - about cleansing being &quot;completed&quot; and about there still being mixed cities in Baghdad - and prove him wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kagan said that the myth is that the cleansing was <strong>completed</strong>. He backs it up by demonstrating that there are still mixed neighborhoods in Baghdad. Both claims are true, and not once does he claim that there has not been sectarian cleansing or a reduction of mixed cities; simply put, he&#8217;s pointing out the reality that the cleansing was never &#8220;completed,&#8221; as indicated by your maps. </p>
<p>I challenge anyone to break down what Kagan said &#8211; about cleansing being &#8220;completed&#8221; and about there still being mixed cities in Baghdad &#8211; and prove him wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winski</title>
		<link>http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Winski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/2008/03/25/kagan-cleansing-myth/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m continually astonished that this fat man gets to speak at all! He has NO facts - blunders his way thru Cheeney&#039;s talking points and clearly has NO &lt;strong&gt;(ZERO)&lt;/strong&gt; experience actually DOING anything he claims to be expert on in his &quot;analysis&quot;..

IF these hacks want to talk, let them talk to themselves in a sealed vacuum chamber. Leave reality to us that actually live it day to day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m continually astonished that this fat man gets to speak at all! He has NO facts &#8211; blunders his way thru Cheeney&#8217;s talking points and clearly has NO <strong>(ZERO)</strong> experience actually DOING anything he claims to be expert on in his &#8220;analysis&#8221;..</p>
<p>IF these hacks want to talk, let them talk to themselves in a sealed vacuum chamber. Leave reality to us that actually live it day to day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
